<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Formal-Verification on Echoes from the Shell</title><link>/tags/formal-verification/</link><description>Recent content in Formal-Verification on Echoes from the Shell</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="/tags/formal-verification/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Software Was Never Safe — AI Just Made the Uncertainty Impossible to Ignore</title><link>/posts/software-was-never-safe-only-stochastic/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/posts/software-was-never-safe-only-stochastic/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The most common objection to letting AI write production code is some flavor of this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;But you can&amp;rsquo;t &lt;strong&gt;prove&lt;/strong&gt; it&amp;rsquo;s safe. You can&amp;rsquo;t &lt;strong&gt;prove&lt;/strong&gt; it&amp;rsquo;s correct. A human would understand the system; the model is just guessing.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s a fair instinct. It&amp;rsquo;s also, on closer inspection, a fully general objection — one that, applied honestly, disqualifies nearly every piece of software you already trust with your money, your messages, and your medical records.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>